March 8th, 2012

Fueled by superheated fears generated by economic dislocation, a proliferation of demonizing conspiracy theories, and the reality of an African-American president in Barack Obama, radical hates groups and antigovernment groups grew explosively in 2011, according to a new report by the Southern Poverty Law Center. This year’s report, The Year in Hate and Extremism (pdf), follows past work where the SPLC catalogs the number of ‘hate groups’ and other radical rightwing movements in the US and gauges their motivations and the size of their membership.

“The SPLC counted 1,018 hate groups operating the United States last year, up from 1,002 in 2010. That was the latest in a string of annual increases going all the way back to 2000, when there were 602 hate groups,” reads the report. Exploiting the issue of “non-white immigration” by such groups was cited as the driving force behind such growth.

The most stunning growth among all groups came among the rightwing anti-government “Patriot” groups, which the report classifies as those groups which perceive the “federal government as their primary enemy.” The “Patriot” groups grew from 149 groups in 2008, skyrocketed to 512 in 2009, jumped to 824 in 2010, and last year continued to surge to 1,274. That’s a 755% growth spurt in just three years.

“The increase has just been astounding,” Mark Potok, editor-in-chief of the SPLC reporttoldthe Murrow News Service. “The reality is that many of these groups are becoming more and more fearful that Barack Obama will win the re-election. You can see the anger rising along with that fear.”

the New York Times reports

March 7th, 2012

The Good News Club: The Stealth Assault on America’s Children by Katherine Stewart uncovers a right-wing conspiracy to infiltrate and destroy the nation’s public school system, using recent Supreme Court decisions as a lever. It’s a must-read for anyone who’s seen public school kids, perhaps their own, targeted for proselytizing by peers, teachers and adult volunteers. And for those who haven’t, it’s a wake-up call.  

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas once wrote, “Religion is certainly a source of positive values, and we need as many positive values in the school as we can get.” It sounds benign. But what if the particular brand of religion is coercive, and in conflict with the teachings and values of the family of the students being targeted? It doesn’t matter. Because under the law as it stands now, evangelical churches have the right to gather, teach and proselytize in your neighborhood school. 

Spiritual Warfare in Your Neighborhood

How did it come to this? If you haven’t personally observed today’s aggressive “spiritual warfare,” it may be difficult to imagine that young children are being taught that their school is a battlefield and they are the warriors who must save their classmates from themselves. With a remarkable amount of grace and restraint, Stewart describes the havoc in communities around the nation as initiatives to evangelize public school students have increased. The effect is always the same: the polarization that results when the Good News Club shows up inevitably disrupts the ability of parents and teachers to work cooperatively as a school community. And the resulting dissension and loss of trust in the schools, says Stewart, is exactly the result the right wing has in mind.

The religious right’s big break was a 2001 Supreme Court case, The Good News Club v. Milford Central School, which unleashed a new wave of school evangelization. This decision essentially told schools they could not say no to church groups that wanted to use their facilities for after-school gatherings. Stewart describes “the new legal juggernaut of the Christian Right” —an army of legal advocacy groups, including the Alliance Defense Fund, the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), Liberty Counsel, and others — that raise hundred of millions of dollars each year for the common goal of injecting stealth evangelism into public schools. They’ve spent the last 10 years figuring out how to use this decision as a wedge to maximize church control over school curricula, personnel and even the physical campus.

The spear point of this effort is the Child Evangelism Fellowship (CEF), which was founded in 1937. For decades, CEF has run Good News Clubs — after-school Bible classes taught by church-trained mothers and pastors’ wives in suburban homes around the country. But the Supreme Court decision made it legal to bring these classes right into the schools; and the volunteers who teach them typically also volunteer as classroom aides, which gives them a mantle of school authority. To a primary-aged child, it looks as though this indoctrination is simply a part of the school curriculum.

Read More.

February 24th, 2012

Imagine this: in a week when the latest presidential campaign finance reports reveal a growing list of million-dollar donors to super PACs, right-wing bloggers and Republican lawyers are defending the Supreme Court’s controversial 2010 Citizens United decisions as maligned by media and of course, liberals.

The apologists are saying there’s nothing corrupt going on; it wasn’t caused byCitizen Unitedanyway; it’s people not corporations writing the checks; it’s only free speech; it’s always been done; and it’s good for democracy.

Let’s unmask these silly assertions one by one. It might come as a shock to the right, but Americans who care about democracy can see through their charade.

Read More.

February 21st, 2012

For many pundits and politicians on the Right, the visceral impulse to shame women for being in control of their own sexuality is so overwhelming that they appear to be totally incapable of maintaining their usual message discipline. That’s going to cost them the fight over contraception.

The polling on the Obama administration’s recent “accommodation” with the Catholic bishops reveals an important trend. When the issue is framed as a battle over “religious liberty” for institutions associated with the church, Americans are deeply divided. When it’s about access to contraception, they’re not – overwhelming majorities are in favor of mandating that religiously affiliated employers provide their workers with insurance that covers birth control.

The numbers don’t lie. A Pew poll that offered little in the way of explanation of the new rule asked those who had heard about it (62 percent of respondents) whether “religiously affiliated institutions that object to the use of contraceptives should be given an exemption from the rule,” and found that a plurality sided with the bishops (by a margin of 48-44).

Read More.

November 9th, 2011

There is a brutal movement in America that legitimizes child abuse in the name of God. Two stories recently converged to make us pay attention. Last week, a video went viral of a Texas judge brutally whipping his disabled daughter. And on Monday, the New York Times published a story about child deaths in homes that have embraced the teachings of To Train Up a Child, a book by Christian preacher Michael Pearl that advocates using a switch on children as young as six months old. 

What many people may not realize is that in the evangelical alternative universe of the home school movement, tightly knit church communities and the following of a number of big-time leaders and authors, physical punishment of children has been glorified for years.

As the Times illustrates — “Preaching Virtue of Spanking, Even as Deaths Fuel Debate” — the books of Michael Pearl and his wife Debi have been found in the homes where several children were killed. 

Read More. Get Angry. Get Up and Stand Up. This is your country too. 

November 2nd, 2011

Fox News is now actively concealing a link between an Alabama-based blogger repeatedly featured on the network as an expert and allegations of a domestic terrorist plot. This morning on America’s Newsroom, Fox News ran an extensive report on yesterday’s arrest of four Georgia men accused of plotting an attack on federal employees and U.S. citizens using explosives, guns, and the biological toxin ricin. At the end of the segment, correspondent Jonathan Serrie pointed out that one of the defendants “allegedly cited the online novel Absolved, which discusses small groups of citizens attacking U.S. officials,” with the defendant allegedly “saying that the attacks would be based on events in that novel.” Charging documents indeed state that accused plotter Frederick Thomas repeatedly cited as an inspiration the novel Absolved, in which underground militia fighters declare war on the federal government over gun control laws and same-sex marriage, leading to a second American revolution. But Fox’s report neglected to mention the allegedly inspirational novel’s author, who is no stranger to Fox viewers. Indeed, the author, Mike Vanderboegh, has been mainstreamed by the network, which has repeatedly featured him as an expert on the ATF’s failed Operation Fast and Furious. Fox has identified Vanderboegh as an “online journalist” and an “authority on the Fast and Furious investigation,” and has consistently failed to acknowledge his extremist views, actions, and affiliations.

More

August 2nd, 2011

‘Impossible’

Mr Lippestad said Mr Breivik’s list of demands was “far from the real world” and “completely impossible to fulfil” and showed “he doesn’t know how society works”.

Norwegian flagThe 22 July attacks have traumatised Norway

“His demands here includes the complete overthrowing of both the Norwegian and European societies,” he told the Associated Press. “But it shows that he doesn’t understand the situation he’s in.”

The 32-year-old had linked his demands to his willingness to share information about other alleged terrorist cells, Mr Lippestad said.

Norwegian police have previously cast doubt on Mr Breivik’s claims that he was part of a broader network but said they would investigate them.

A court has appointed two psychiatrists to try to examine Mr Breivik’s actions, with a mandate to report back by 1 November.

Mr Lippestad said Mr Breivik had asked that he also be examined by Japanese mental health specialists as he believes “the Japanese understand the idea and values of honour” and would understand him better than Europeans.

The lawyer has previously said his client is probably insane.

Mr Lippestad added that a second list from his client requested items like cigarettes and civilian clothes.

July 26th, 2011
May 5th, 2011
May 3rd, 2011

In which I listen to the reactions of Beck, Hannity, Savage, et al. regarding the demise of Osama Bin Laden — so you don’t have to…

1) All the credit should go to Bush.

2) All the credit should go to Cheney.

3) All the credit should go to Giuliani.

4) All the credit should go to Rumsfeld.

#5-#10 after the jump…

5) All the credit should go to the military and CIA, whose budgets must now be increased.

6) All the credit should go to the enhanced interrogators without whose enhanced interrogation we would never have found OBL.

7) Obama better not try to take any credit because that would be politicizing a great patriotic event.

8) How dare Osama, I mean Obama, bury Obama, I mean Osama, at sea, rather than putting his head on a pike in the Rose Garden with a webcam so we can watch crows pick his eyes out?

9) The religious burial rites show that Sharia Law has superseded the Constitution.

10) The only appropriate music for such occasions is crappy, jingoistic Country music.

And an Honorable Mention for the most backhanded compliment goes to Michael Savage: “Maybe it takes a radical Marxist to kill an Islamic terrorist.”

(Crossposted from http://www.sampratt.com)

Updated by Hudson at Tue May 03, 2011 at 12:47 PM PDT

Another sub-theme I neglected to mention: Look—over there—Iran is about to get nukes! We better take out Ahmedinajad, too.