January 8th, 2013

Reblog this if you post any of the following:

cognitivedissonance:

thedailydissident:

politics
economics
social justice/activism
culture
leftist stuff
drug war
occupy wall street
unions/labor
war/foreign policy
feminism
racism
classism

If your blog posts anything like the above, please reblog this so I can follow you! I really want to build up a big network of progressive bloggers to help inspire my own vision and get more involved in activism in general.

Please and thank you, comrades!


Oh hi mostly my entire blog. 

Well, except cat pictures. I post those often.

September 5th, 2012
elledark:

Bernie Sanders - The American People Are AngryOne of Washingtons’s very few honest politicians, Senator Bernie Sanders, delivered a blistering Labor Day critique of the USA’s failed economic policies and obscene inequality of wealth. He said ..“The American people are angry because they see the great middle class of this country collapsing, poverty increasing and the gap between the very rich and everyone else grow wider.  They are angry because they see this great country, which so many of our veterans fought for and died for, becoming an oligarchy - a nation where our economic and political life are controlled by a handful of billionaire families. In the United States today, we have the most unequal distribution of wealth and income since the 1920s.  Today, the wealthiest 400 individuals own more wealth than the bottom half of America - 150 million people. Today, the six heirs to the Wal-Mart fortune own more wealth than the bottom 30 percent.Today, the top one percent own 40 percent of all wealth, while the bottom sixty percent owns less than 2 percent.  Incredibly, the bottom 40 percent of all Americans own just 3/10ths of one percent of the wealth of the country.According to a new study from the Federal Reserve, median net worth for middle class families dropped by nearly 40 percent from 2007-2010.  That’s the equivalent of wiping out 18 years of savings for the average middle class family.The distribution of income is even worse.  If you can believe it, the last study on this subject showed that in 2010, 93 percent of all new income created from the previous year went to the top one percent, while the bottom 99 percent of people had the privilege of enjoying the remaining 7 percent. In other words, the rich are getting much richer while almost everyone else is falling behind.Not only is this inequality of wealth and income morally grotesque, it is bad economic policy.  If working families are deeply in debt, and have little or no income to spend on goods and services, how can we expand the economy and create the millions of jobs we desperately need?  There is a limit as to how many yachts, mansions, limos and fancy jewelry the super-rich can buy.  We need to put income into the hands of working families.” (extract from Bernie Sanders Labor Day message .. full text here)

elledark:

Bernie Sanders - The American People Are Angry

One of Washingtons’s very few honest politicians, Senator Bernie Sanders, delivered a blistering Labor Day critique of the USA’s failed economic policies and obscene inequality of wealth. He said ..

“The American people are angry because they see the great middle class of this country collapsing, poverty increasing and the gap between the very rich and everyone else grow wider.  They are angry because they see this great country, which so many of our veterans fought for and died for, becoming an oligarchy - a nation where our economic and political life are controlled by a handful of billionaire families. 

In the United States today, we have the most unequal distribution of wealth and income since the 1920s.  Today, the wealthiest 400 individuals own more wealth than the bottom half of America - 150 million people. 

Today, the six heirs to the Wal-Mart fortune own more wealth than the bottom 30 percent.

Today, the top one percent own 40 percent of all wealth, while the bottom sixty percent owns less than 2 percent.  Incredibly, the bottom 40 percent of all Americans own just 3/10ths of one percent of the wealth of the country.

According to a new study from the Federal Reserve, median net worth for middle class families dropped by nearly 40 percent from 2007-2010.  That’s the equivalent of wiping out 18 years of savings for the average middle class family.

The distribution of income is even worse.  If you can believe it, the last study on this subject showed that in 2010, 93 percent of all new income created from the previous year went to the top one percent, while the bottom 99 percent of people had the privilege of enjoying the remaining 7 percent. In other words, the rich are getting much richer while almost everyone else is falling behind.

Not only is this inequality of wealth and income morally grotesque, it is bad economic policy.  If working families are deeply in debt, and have little or no income to spend on goods and services, how can we expand the economy and create the millions of jobs we desperately need?  There is a limit as to how many yachts, mansions, limos and fancy jewelry the super-rich can buy.  We need to put income into the hands of working families.”

 (extract from Bernie Sanders Labor Day message .. full text here)

(via drinkthe-koolaid)

June 25th, 2012
motherjones:

We f***ing love this Reddit post (and the top comment.) Comment thread here. Original article here.

motherjones:

We f***ing love this Reddit post (and the top comment.) Comment thread here. Original article here.

June 10th, 2012
May 6th, 2012
thepoliticalnotebook:

zainyk:

Paris, 8pm: OFFICIAL - FRANCOIS HOLLANDE ELECTED PRESIDENT OF FRANCE
Becomes first Socialist President since Francois Mitterrand left office in 1988. 
Incroyable.

52% of the vote to Sarko’s 48%. He’s the first incumbent in France in three decades to not win re-election and the ninth eurozone leader to fall in two years. 
Extras, for anybody interested: Hollande’s election team has/had a Tumblr, for the French speakers on here. Also, earlier this week I wrote about the far-right’s role in French politics this election. Hollande may have won, but we haven’t seen the last of Le Pen and the Front National this year…

thepoliticalnotebook:

zainyk:

Paris, 8pm: OFFICIAL - FRANCOIS HOLLANDE ELECTED PRESIDENT OF FRANCE

Becomes first Socialist President since Francois Mitterrand left office in 1988. 

Incroyable.

52% of the vote to Sarko’s 48%. He’s the first incumbent in France in three decades to not win re-election and the ninth eurozone leader to fall in two years. 

Extras, for anybody interested: Hollande’s election team has/had a Tumblr, for the French speakers on here. Also, earlier this week I wrote about the far-right’s role in French politics this election. Hollande may have won, but we haven’t seen the last of Le Pen and the Front National this year…

(Source: waitingonoblivion, via kateoplis)

April 25th, 2012

drinkthe-koolaid:

When David Cameron became PM, and announced his austerity plans — buying completely into both the confidence fairy and the invisible bond vigilantes — many were the hosannas, from both sides of the Atlantic. Pundits here urged Obama to “do a Cameron”; Cameron and Osborne were the toast of Very Serious People everywhere.

Now Britain is officially in double-dip recession, and has achieved the remarkable feat of doing worse this time around than it did in the 1930s.

Britain is also unique in having chosen the Big Wrong freely, facing neither pressure from bond markets nor conditions imposed by Berlin and Frankfurt.

Now, the defense I hear from Cameron apologists is that the austerity mostly hasn’t even hit yet. But that’s really not much of a defense. Remember, the austerity was supposed to work by inspiring confidence; where’s the confidence? Basically, the expansionary aspect should already have kicked in; it’s all contraction from here.

Needless to say, Cameron and Osborne insist that they will not change course, which means that Britain will continue on a death spiral of self-defeating austerity.

duh

(Source: waitingonoblivion)

March 4th, 2012

I’m fascinated by [America’s income inequality] because a lot of the people who vote for this laissez-faire market policy are the people who get creamed by it.

It’s like a casino: They’re looking at the guy winning- the guy who pulled the lever and all the bells went off and all the coins fell out of the slot machine- and they think “that could be me. I want to play by those rules.” But actually those are the house rules, and most of you are going to lose.

David Simon on unregulated capitalism (via thesoapboxschtick)

Now if he would just stop wearing those Hawaiian shirts.

(via paxamericana)

(via misteorias)

March 1st, 2012

Keeping one American service member in Afghanistan costs between $850,000 and $1.4 million a year, depending on who you ask. But one matter is clear, that cost is going up.

(Source: azspot)

February 29th, 2012
It takes a good crisis to get us going. When we feel fear and we fear loss we are capable of quite extraordinary things.
-Paul Gilding
(via kristen12592)

(Source: ted.com, via kristen12592)

January 3rd, 2012

Contrary to the opinion that we’re headed for a consumer-led recovery in 2012, most economic analysts see little movement on consumer spending. Wages have not grown, credit-financed spending has returned and cannot sustain much past where it is, and most of the job growth over the past two years have come in low-wage service sectors. If we’re not going to see consumer growth at the low end, it doesn’t make much sense that autos and homes, the largest consumer purchases you can find, will suddenly fly off the shelves. Consumer spending isn’t likely to collapse in 2012, but it’s also not likely to get measurably better.

Read More